Press RSS feed for this section

Job Skills Aren’t Everything When it Comes to the Right Hire

The following book excerpt is from Hiring For Attitude by Mark Murphy.

If your organization is going to excel, it needs the right people. But virtually every one of the standard approaches to selecting those right people is dead wrong. And here’s why: whenever managers talk about hiring the right people, they usually mean “highly skilled people.” For lots of executives, the war for talent is a war for the most technically competent people. But that’s really the wrong war to be fighting.

Most new hires do not fail on the job due to a lack of skill. My company, Leadership IQ, tracked 20,000 new hires over a three-year period. Within their first 18 months, 46 per cent of them failed (got fired, received poor performance reviews, or were written up). And as bad as that sounds, it’s pretty consistent with other studies over the years and thus not too shocking. Read More…

Do You Suffer from a Lack of Coachability?

The biggest reason that new hires fail is a lack of coachability.

The 2012 hiring season is here and 46% of the people about to be hired will fail within the first 18 months on the job.  And the real surprise?  They’re not going to fail for lack of skills; they will fail for lack of attitude.

When new hires fail, 89% of the time it’s because of attitude and only 11% of the time because of skill.  It’s not that skills aren’t important, but when the top predictor of a new hire’s success or failure is dependent on attitude, then attitude is clearly what we need to be hiring for.  And that requires defining the specific attitudes (both good and bad) that make a specific organization different from all the rest, and then turning the hiring and interview process focus onto those attitudes.

What do job seekers need to know about getting hired? Read More…

Hiring for Attitude: A Revolutionary Approach to Recruiting

When new hires fail, and 46% of them will, 89% of the time it’s because of attitude and only 11% of the time because of skill.  It’s not that skills aren’t important, but when the top predictor of a new hire’s success or failure is dependent on attitude, then attitude is clearly what we need to be hiring for.  And that requires defining the specific attitudes (both good and bad) that make a specific organization different from all the rest, and then turning the hiring and interview process focus onto those attitudes.  – Mark Murphy, Author of Hiring for Attitude: A Revolutionary Approach to Recruiting and Selecting People with Both Tremendous Skills and Superb Attitude

In Hiring for Attitude, leadership strategist Mark Murphy presents convincing reasons and case studies on why your new hires fail to rise to your expectations. If you need people to fit to your company culture you must make the selection process smart enough to attract the right talent – there’s a five part interview question that gets candidates to reveal the truth and not just go about the beaten path of rehearsed interview answers.

Who’ll benefit the most from this book? Read More…

TotalPicture Radio | Who’s Getting Hired in 2012? Hiring for Attitude

Mark Murphy, CEO, Leadership IQ – Whos Getting Hired in 2012? Hiring for Attitude | TotalPicture Radio | Podcast Career Advice and Leadership Development.

New book shows the new traits employers are hiring for and the latest techniques they use to find them…

Welcome to a special Talent Acquisition Channel Podcast on TotalPicture Radio. This is Peter Clayton reporting.

Mark Murphy is the founder and CEO of Leadership IQ. He leads one of the world’s largest studies on goal-setting and leadership, and his groundbreaking research has been featured in Fortune, Forbes, Businessweek, U.S. News & World Report, the Washington Post, and hundreds more periodicals. Mark is the author of the new book Hiring for Attitude published by McGraw Hill. Based on research of 20,000 new hires over a three-year period, Hiring for Attitude shows how companies can accurately diagnose their culture’s unique characteristics, and then recruit and select high performers to fit perfectly.

Questions Peter Clayton asks Mark Murphy in this podcast:

In Hiring for Attitude you state, “46% of the people hired fail within the first 18 months on the job.” What is the source of this statistic and why is it so high? When making a hiring decision, why do you believe attitude is more important than skills? Read More…

Small Businesses Should Hire for Attitude

Small Businesses Should Hire for Attitude | There isn’t a skills shortage—it’s an attitude shortage that’s hurting companies

Small Businesses Should Hire for Attitude | There isnt a skills shortage—its an attitude shortage thats hurting companies | BusinessNewsDaily.com.

 

Mark Murphy, the chief executive officer of Leadership IQ, a leadership training and management consulting firm, has some sobering news for small businesses and startup companies that are getting ready to bring new hires on board in 2012: Nearly half of them are going to fail before hitting their second anniversary and most of the time it isn’t because they don’t have the right skills — it’s because they don’t have the right attitude.

In his new book “Hiring for Attitude” (McGraw-Hill, 2011), based on three years of research on 20,000 new employees, Murphy details a new approach for choosing high performers with the right attitude to thrive in your company’s culture. He recently shared some of his key concepts with BusinessNewsDaily.

BusinessNewsDaily: What’s wrong with the way most companies hire people?

Mark Murphy: When most managers talk about hiring the “right people,” they mean ‘”highly skilled people” who can do the tasks of the job. But when our research tracked 20,000 new hires, 46 percent of them failed within 18 months, and 89 percent of the time it was for attitudinal reasons and not skills.   It’s not that skills aren’t important, but when the top predictor of a new hire’s success or failure is dependent on attitude, then attitude is clearly what we need to be hiring for.   By fail, we mean these folks got fired, received poor performance reviews, or were written up.  The attitudinal deficits that doomed these failed hires included a lack of coachability, low levels of emotional intelligence, motivation and temperament.

BND: Why is having the right attitude so important?

MM:The “right” attitude is as unique as the organization to which it belongs.  For example, Southwest Airlines and the Ritz-Carlton are both great companies, but the attitudes driving their respective success are as different as night and day.  And it goes without saying that someone who is competitive and individualistic may be the perfect fit for a solo-hunter commission-driven sales force. But put that same personality to work in a collaborative, fun-loving team culture, and that individualistic superstar is doomed to fail.

BND:Can job candidate effectively fake attitude? What are the signs you should look for?

MM: Absolutely, and this is why it is so important to identify the exact attitudes you are looking for, create dependable interview questions that reveal the truth about attitude, and have reliable answer guidelines by which to evaluate candidate responses to interview questions.

Leadership IQ is engaged in some pretty cutting-edge textual analysis research that assesses the differences in language usage between high and low performers that can signal when someone is faking attitude.   For instance, when you ask high performers to tell you about a past experience, they’re 40 percent more likely than low performers to answer using past tense verbs.  That’s because high performers actually have the experience to recount and they’re not afraid to reveal their attitude to you.

BND: Why is hiring the right person so critical for small businesses and startups?

MM: Two reasons: First, the teams and work groups are smaller, so the damage that someone with a bad attitude can do is magnified.  Here’s an important exercise: Ask every one of your high performers if they would rather work short-staffed or work with someone with a bad attitude.  Every time we do this, people always say “short-staffed.”

Second, there’s tremendous opportunity cost.  How many good opportunities for new sales or new products, etc., get missed while the wrong person is taking up a seat that could or should be occupied by a real high performer?

BN: Tell me about “Brown Shorts.”

MM: Brown Shorts arethe specific attitudes that make your organization different from everybody else.   The name “Brown Shorts” pays homage to Southwest Airlines and their unique culture of fun and draws from a story I heard from a former Southwest executive about a round of hiring for new pilots (typically serious folks dressed formally in black suits, etc.).   The Southwest interviewer invited this serious bunch to get comfortable in brown Bermuda shorts that were part of the Southwest summer uniform, but it was an invitation that seemed too ridiculous for many of the pilots who immediately declined the shorts.  And that told Southwest that these folks may be great pilots, but they just weren’t going to fit a fun-loving culture.

BN: What are the questions you should ask and how should you phrase them?

MM: Once you’ve discovered your Brown Shorts attitudes, you just turn them into Brown Shorts questions.  For example, imagine you discover that at your organization, when you ask employees to do something they don’t know how to do, high performers proactively acquire new skills while low performers throw up their hands and complain. From there it’s simply a matter of phrasing it into a question: “Could you tell me about a time you were given an assignment and didn’t know what to do?”

We start with “Could you” instead of “Tell me” because it makes it feel more like a conversation than an interview. In response, candidates are less guarded and share more.  And we eliminate all tip-offs, such as ending the question with “and what did you do?” Leaving the question hanging can be a scary prospect for interviewers, and it may provide some uncomfortable silences.  But it’s the key to differentiating between the high and low performers.

BN: What are the questions to avoid like the plague?

MM: Surprisingly, some of the most common interview questions are also the least effective; including “Tell me about yourself”and”What are your weaknesses?” One of the most fundamental tests of the effectiveness of an interview question is the extent to which it differentiates high and low performers.  Yet, when asked, “what are your weaknesses?” virtually every candidate will say they “work too hard” or “care too much” or “have a perfectionist streak.”  You’re not going to discover someone’s real attitude by asking questions to which everyone has a canned or prepared answer.

BN: How long should the vetting and interviewing process take? 

MM: Most companies spend too little time interviewing candidates; right now 60 minutes is about the median time.  If you can double or triple that, it’s always a good idea.  But that said, within the typical 60-minute interview, most interviewers report they only need five or six Brown Shorts questions to conduct a successful interview.

BN: How can you tell you’ve found the right person?

MM: Easy. They are happy and confident to wear your Brown Shorts.  And they quickly join the ranks of your high performers.

Reach BusinessNewsDaily senior writer Ned Smith at nsmith@techmedianetwork.com. Follow him on Twitter @nedbsmith.

Hiring for Attitude – ABC TV 12/19/11

chicagotribune.com – I Just Work Here: In 2012, companies should give happiness a chance

I Just Work Here: In 2012, companies should give happiness a chance – chicagotribune.com.

Mark on the ChicagoTribune.com feature about office culture:

“Mark Murphy, author of “Hiring for Attitude: A Revolutionary Approach to Recruiting Star Performers With Both Tremendous Skills and Superb Attitude” and CEO of the management consulting firm Leadership IQ, has researched this and found that it has little to do with the clever perks and attempts at office fun that many companies employ.

Studying businesses in the United States and China, Murphy found that offices that have “enterprising cultures” — ones where creativity and intelligence are valued and people advance based on merit and not seniority — have the most engaged employees.

“It’s not about social things like many think, like making everybody happy because everybody has a great friend at work,” Murphy said. “Google has the cafeteria and the food and the dry cleaning, and some people think that’s the key to happiness. But the real thing that makes Google so successful is the competition of ideas, the pure meritocracy, whoever has the best idea wins.”

According to Murphy’s study of more than 1,400 U.S.-based companies, only about 20 percent of employees consider themselves to be “highly engaged.” So, clearly, there’s work to be done.

“What they really need is a workplace that isn’t going to irritate them,” Murphy said. “A workplace where if they have a really good idea, the boss is going to recognize it, even if it upsets 20 years of doing things a certain way.”