Executive communication coaching: make your message easier to act on

In this article Expand table of contents Collapse table of contents

What does executive communication coaching address?

The central question is whether the people you lead understand what matters and what they need to do. A message can be accurate and still be hard to use. It may bury the recommendation, overlook the audience’s decision, or blur the difference between information, a request, and a commitment.

Communication can be the focus of Mark Murphy’s 90-day executive coaching sprint. The goal is to examine the situations where your message breaks down and practice a more effective approach.

Five situations where communication coaching can help

Presenting to executives who want the conclusion first

A detailed chronological explanation may feel thorough to you and slow to your audience. Start with the decision or recommendation, explain the consequence, and then provide the evidence needed to evaluate it. Our guide to speaking to impatient executives explores this mismatch in more detail.

Influencing colleagues who do not report to you

A persuasive recommendation needs to acknowledge the other function’s priorities and constraints. Identify the shared outcome, the tradeoff you are asking them to accept, and the commitment you need. More data may not resolve a disagreement about who carries the risk.

Giving feedback that changes behavior

Broad labels such as “not strategic” or “too negative” leave people guessing. Describe the observed behavior, explain its effect, invite the other person’s account, and agree on what should happen differently. The conversation needs enough specificity to support follow-through.

Responding to difficult questions

Answer the question being asked before defending the whole proposal. If you do not know, identify what you do know, what remains uncertain, and how you will resolve it. A clear acknowledgment of uncertainty can be more useful than a confident answer built on an assumption.

Communicating a decision people do not like

Separate the decision from the parts of implementation that remain open to input. Explain the reasons and constraints without implying that a settled decision is still up for a vote. Invite questions about the consequences and make the next steps explicit.

An example: turn an update into a recommendation

Consider an illustrative operating review. A leader opens with: “We have been looking at the service issue for several weeks, and there are a number of things to discuss.” The audience must work out whether it is hearing background, a warning, or a request.

A more useful opening might be: “I recommend delaying the launch by two weeks to resolve the service issue. That protects the customer experience but pushes revenue into next month. Today I need agreement on the revised date and the team that will own the fix.”

The second opening gives the audience something to evaluate. It does not guarantee agreement. It makes the recommendation, tradeoff, and requested decision visible, so disagreement can focus on the substance.

Adapt to the audience without losing the substance

People differ in how they prefer to receive information. Some want the conclusion quickly; others need the supporting detail to feel comfortable with a decision. A useful communication habit is to make the structure explicit: offer the recommendation first, explain the essential reasoning, and invite deeper questions where needed.

Leadership IQ’s communication styles assessment can prompt reflection on your preferences. Use that insight to ask better questions about your audience, rather than assuming a label explains every interaction.

What would you work on with a coach?

Start with a specific conversation or presentation. Reconstruct what you intended, what you actually said, and how the other person responded. Separate an observation such as “she asked for the recommendation twice” from an interpretation such as “she does not respect my work.”

Then choose a behavior to test. You might shorten the opening, state the request earlier, ask a clarifying question before responding, or check what the listener understood. Review what happened and adjust. The FIRE Model offers a practical way to examine facts, interpretations, reactions, and the end you want to reach.

In Mark’s sprint, the work begins with a 90-minute strategic intake and includes a structured progress review in week 12. The specific communication priorities come from your leadership challenges.

How to evaluate communication progress

Choose measures that match the situation. Can the listener restate your recommendation accurately? Does a meeting end with clear ownership? Are follow-up questions about the substance rather than confusion over what you meant? Does a feedback conversation produce an agreed next step?

Ask colleagues for concrete examples. “Was that better?” invites a polite rating. “Which part of the recommendation was still unclear?” gives you something to work on. Review both the message and your listening; clarity is a two-way task.

Common questions

How is communication coaching different from executive presence coaching?

Communication coaching concentrates on messages, conversations, and understanding. Executive presence coaching also examines how your judgment and behavior are experienced under pressure. The two can overlap, but the coaching goal should identify the specific change you need.

Is this only for public speaking?

No. A one-to-one conversation with a direct report or a difficult exchange with a peer can be as important as a large presentation. Choose the setting that matters to your responsibilities.

How much does it cost?

For Mark’s 90-day sprint, quote after the complimentary strategy call. The executive coaching cost guide explains how to compare the scope and fee.

How do I choose a coach?

Bring a recent communication problem to the introductory conversation. Use our executive coach selection guide to evaluate the questions, approach, and working relationship.